Licence
Latest

Official medical examination order: check deadlines and consequences

Received an Austrian official medical examination order? Check its requirements, deadlines, finality and consequences under section 24 FSG.

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Your law firm

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

Law firm in Salzburg

Every matter is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In driving licence cases we look at the file, deadlines and commercial consequences together.

2 August 2026, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

An Austrian authority order requiring an official medical examination is more than a simple appointment notice. It may require a specific examination, identified medical findings or, in a different case, a new driving test and may set a deadline for compliance.

The operative part, reasons, service, appeal instructions and compliance deadline should be reviewed separately. Use the document check to prepare the complete file for medical and legal review.

Section 24(4) FSG links the order to possible withdrawal

Where doubts arise as to continued medical fitness, section 24(4) FSG requires the authority to obtain an official medical assessment under section 8 FSG. The driving entitlement may then be restricted or withdrawn where appropriate. The order is part of the fitness proceedings but does not itself determine the medical outcome.

The provision also governs non-compliance. If the holder fails within the set period to comply with a final order requiring an official medical examination, the findings needed for that assessment or a new driving test, the driving entitlement must be withdrawn until the order is complied with. The precise operative part, finality and the deadline actually set are therefore decisive.

Three document situations

Distinguish an appointment notice, an order and a withdrawal

Documents with similar wording may have different legal functions. Their heading, operative part and appeal instructions must be read together.

Match the document type to the immediate review task
Document situation What it shows Typical risk
Invitation or organisational appointment notice Date, place, contact point and requested documents Treating the letter as a formal order without checking its legal form
Formal order under section 24(4) FSG Binding requirement, compliance deadline, reasons and appeal instructions Recording only the appointment while missing the appeal period or scope of the order
Later withdrawal decision for non-compliance Separate decision on the driving entitlement and the alleged failure to comply Failing to review the original order, finality, expiry and actual compliance together

The label alone is not enough. Review the complete content, every attachment and the documented procedural position.

The operative part must identify the required action

Section 24(4) FSG lists several possible requirements. The holder may be ordered to attend an official medical examination, provide the findings required for the assessment or retake the driving test. Mark every required action, the addressee, the responsible body and the deadline in the operative part.

Section 8 FSG provides the professional framework for the medical assessment. If special findings or a traffic psychology statement are needed because of behaviour relevant to traffic psychology, the assessment is prepared by an official medical officer. The actual order and later correspondence still determine which documents are required in the individual proceedings.

The compliance deadline and appeal period are different

The deadline set in the order specifies when the required action must be completed. Section 24(4) FSG does not prescribe one uniform period for every case. Use only the date or calculation stated in the actual operative part and check when the decision was validly served.

Separately, section 7(4) VwGVG generally provides four weeks for an appeal against an administrative decision. The commencement depends in particular on service. Until referral to the administrative court, submissions must be filed with the respondent authority under section 12 VwGVG. Keep the decision, proof of service and all attachments ready for prompt legal review.

Finality and suspensive effect must not be assumed

The consequence for non-compliance under section 24(4) FSG expressly refers to a final order. Finality cannot be established from the decision date alone. Service, any appeal, proof of filing and later procedural decisions must be reviewed together.

Under section 13(1) VwGVG, a timely and admissible appeal against an administrative decision generally has suspensive effect. The authority may exclude that effect under the statutory conditions. Do not rely merely on the statement that an appeal was sent or on oral information. Keep every ruling on effect and enforceability.

The reasons and authority file show the stated concerns

The order should show the basis on which the authority has concerns about medical fitness or professional competence. Organise the reports, findings, notifications, previous assessments and file notes cited in the reasons. A personal medical assessment does not replace a legal and factual review of the authority file.

If cited records are missing or the facts actually on file remain unclear, inspection of the driving licence file can clarify the documentary position. The separate article on the right to be heard explains how a response to disclosed evidence can be prepared.

Document check

Is the order complete for a deadline review?

This check organises the decision, service, performance period and legal-remedy notice for prompt legal review.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

Do you have the complete decision, every attachment and proof of service?

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

The decision or service documents are incomplete.

Secure every page and attachment together with the envelope, collection notice or electronic service record. Without the complete decision, the requirement, compliance deadline and appeal period cannot be reliably separated.

Organise the authority file and missing records →
02

The scope of the order or compliance deadline remains unclear.

Read the operative part word for word. Separate the examination, required findings and any new driving test. Do not use a deadline from another letter.

Classify the medical assessment procedure →
03

The appeal position is not fully documented.

Review service, the appeal instructions, any appeal already filed and every ruling on suspensive effect promptly with the complete file.

Review the appeal route →
04

The decision, requirements, deadlines and appeal position are documented.

Now review the reasons, file basis, proof of compliance and current driving entitlement together. An organised file is not a legal or medical assessment.

Review the decision and appeal →

Documents to keep with the official medical order

  • complete order with reasons and appeal instructions
  • all attachments plus the envelope, collection notice or electronic service record
  • earlier invitations, appointment notices and authority requests
  • the findings or statements expressly required in the operative part
  • registration, appointment confirmation and proof of documents already provided
  • the complete final appeal and proof of filing
  • decisions on suspensive effect or enforceability
  • later correspondence and any separate withdrawal decision

Arrange each document by date and function. Record separately what the authority ordered, what has already been completed and which submissions were demonstrably received in time. This makes it possible to identify whether the authority alleges non-compliance and which file position it relies on.

Compliance and current driving entitlement require separate checks

Section 24(4) FSG describes withdrawal until the order is complied with. Whether the required action has been fully and demonstrably completed depends on the order, the examination, the findings submitted and the response of the authority. Booking an appointment alone does not necessarily comply with every requirement.

Do not infer from later compliance alone that driving may resume immediately. A separate withdrawal decision, the register position, a continuing restriction and the actual return of a seized licence may also matter. The article on surrender and enforceability organises those documents as a separate step.

FAQ

Common questions about an order under section 24 FSG

Is every invitation to an official medical officer already a formal order? +
No. An organisational invitation must be distinguished from a decision containing a binding operative part, reasons and appeal instructions. The complete content of the actual letter is decisive.
How long is the appeal period against the order? +
Section 7(4) VwGVG generally provides four weeks for an appeal against an administrative decision. The commencement depends in particular on valid service. The compliance deadline for the examination or findings is separate.
May I drive immediately after later compliance? +
That must not be inferred from compliance alone. Review any withdrawal decision, the current entitlement, continuing restrictions and, where relevant, the actual return of the driving licence.
Topics
Driving licence lawOfficial medical orderMedical fitnessAppealFSG

A decision, a charge or a looming driving licence measure?

In driving licence law, deadlines and the file decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg